The National Library has now been blogging for about 2 months. To date, Create Readers has 90 posts and 57 comments; LibraryTechNZ has 36 posts and 39 comments.
Comments are one of the things we're watching as we test the blogging waters. As I noted in an earlier post about setting up these blogs, we're pre-moderating comments on Create Readers (checking the comments when they are submitted, and publishing them ourselves) and post-moderating comments on this blog (comments are published as soon as they're submitted, and we check them afterwards).
The most-commented post on Create Readers is 'What book got you hooked', and on LibraryTechNZ it's 'The long(itude) and short on maps'. Both comment threads include comments from National Library staff, which do plump up the numbers a bit, but which are also replies to readers' questions or feedback. So far, we've rejected just one comment - an author who submitted a comment to Create Readers touting his books. One of the things we agreed before launching the blog was that it shouldn't function as an advertising site.
On the upside - we've not had any spamming. On the downside, our own spam filters seems to be blocking some of the comment notifications, which are sent from Blogger to a central email address and then forwarded on to various staff. This means we don't always publish or respond to comments as promptly as I'd like.
One of the things I find most interesting is that some people have used this blog - which is externally hosted - to let us know when they can't access other National Library sites. Now we're considering redirecting web visitors to a notification on this blog when we have a scheduled server outage.
Another thing that I know our Create Readers bloggers find really rewarding is the interaction that the commenting encourages - for example, on this post about Readergirlz, an American online book community. Create Readers gets more shout-outs like that; LibraryTechNZ comments tend to be queries or requests for more information (and the odd correction!).
Come the end of the year we'll be evaluating these blogs, and comment moderation is on the list of things to discuss. Although the experience has been overwhelmingly positive, I'll be recommending that we retain the moderation on Create Readers, as the blog is being used in class rooms.
To be frank, I've been overjoyed with the feedback we've received from readers; I was totally prepared to face up to a comment-desert come the end of the first 3 months of blogging. It's encouraging and motivating to know that people are getting something out of what we write.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Do we need comment moderation?
Posted by
Courtney Johnston
at
11:44 AM
Tags:
blogging,
Courtney Johnston
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
If the way you are doing it right now seems to be working, I would say stay with what you are doing now. I am in the United States and enjoy reading the blog and being able to easily comment on it.
After a bit of playing around with various blogging sites I find at least some measure of comment moderation to be sensible.
I prefer post- to pre-, because it means the majority of positive, productive comments are seen instantly - giving of course the benefit of live interaction, and a livelier debate.
thanks for the feedback.
I've been pleasantly surprised by how little moderation is required, and am finding the post-mod on this blog really useful for exactly the reasons you give.
I'm a bit more risk-averse when it comes to something that could conceivably be used in the classroom, but if we pushed out more blogs, I'd personally be happy to go with post-mod all the way on the current evidence
C
Interesting post Courtney. It looks like as though your moderation is working well.
We moderate the first comments from a contributor but then they are automatically published
http://cclblog.wordpress.com/
The spam filter work well, but I remember being perplexed by the ping back style spam ie.
[…] Siskind wrote an interesting post today on […]
the most exciting thing to me is when you get a real sense of people engaging with the post - expanding, suggesting, debating.
Leonard Cohen, Doris Lessing
What’s passed through my reading shelf recently are some good examples of good comment exchanges ...
Whatever system is used, it is really important to watch the comments, as you say, because there can be questions and feedback that need to be followed up.
I vote "No".
I do not subscribe to the other blog, so can not comment on the content, but this one would seem to me to be sufficiently niche as to not require it.
By the way, I find LibraryTechNZ very useful. Keep up the good work.
Paul Tudor
Information Manager
Tonkin & Taylor Ltd
Thanks for the shout-out Paul: to think I said we never get them ...
And Donna, yeah, I totally agree about watching people take the topic into their own hands via the comments, I hope it continues for both our blogs!
C
Post a Comment